|
MANAGER’S REPORT
For Council Meeting
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Terry St. Peter, City Manager
DATE: Friday, October 13, 2006
I am enclosing a
copy of the advertisement that ran in the Bangor Daily News last weekend for an
Executive Director of the Belfast Area Chamber of Commerce (BACC). I
think it ran in other papers as well. I am enclosing it, for your information,
for two reasons: 1. So that you can see what the Chamber is looking for and 2.
So that you can see the process that is being used.
I keep hearing
rumors and/or speculation that a person to fill the position of Executive
Director has already been determined. I am strongly convinced that that is NOT
the case. Whether it will be somebody from the area or somebody from away will
be determined through an open selection process, as the ad illustrates. I am
convinced that the Chamber Board (of which I am recently a new member) is open
and committed to selecting the best-qualified person possible. I also look
forward to seeing that position filled because I think we will see a major
difference in our business and economic activity in this area, as well as
enhancing the relationship between the business community and the city.
Speaking of
economic activity, I am also enclosing a copy of the notice of a grant award
(Lilac) that the City of Belfast received to assist in regional
economic development. Actually, although the City of Belfast is the stated
recipient, this is a grant to the area office of Eastern Maine Development
Corp., Alan Hinsey, in particular. Alan wrote the application, as you know, and
needed one lead town to sign off on it, so I was available.
Nonetheless, it
is a very positive development for the Belfast-Rockland region and moves even
further along in an economic development effort for the city and the region.
On another
matter, you have all received a communication from John M. Hyk, Chairman of the
County Commissioners, over the apparent withdrawal of the jail variance approval
next year. This is worth further comment. Clearly, something does need to be
done about the corrections requirements in Waldo County, as well as other
counties in Maine. The Somerset County commissioners just decided to postpone
their plans for a $30 million collar jail, at least pending the outcome of the
Tabor referendum. They have concluded that they could not pay for the mail if
Tabor passes. So, governments are caught in between conflicting requirements.
Waldo County has
indeed paid more to transport and board prisoners outside of Waldo County. But
those costs, to date, have been far less than the $2 million annually that a new
jail would cost county property tax payers (the new jail would carry about $1
million in debt service and $1 million in additional operational costs.). So
far, it has been much less expensive to board prisoners out.
But Waldo County
is not the only county facing this dilemma.
John Hyk’s letter
asks municipal officials to suggest solutions. If you agree, I would like to
suggest that Waldo County seek to have conversations with one of its neighboring
counties, especially Knox or Penobscot, to join in having a shared jail.
Apparently because of changes in the laws and judicial system, most counties are
experiencing crowding problems, and it would seem like a good time to get
together to address common problems.
Waldo County has
already spent a goodly sum in retrofitting the existing local jail, which of
course, needed to be done just to maintain the facility until a new one could be
built. It seems to me that Waldo should further fix up that jail so that it
could be used for the long-term for prisoners who need quick access to the
court, while a regional jail should be used for prisoners who are identified to
serve a longer period of time.
Distance for
relatives to visit is no longer a real issue. Jails were built in separate
counties in the 1800’s, before the advent of automobiles. Now, while we would
not want to see long distances involved, such as going to Aroostook or York
counties, it does not seem to be out of the question for prisoner’s families to
visit in Rockland, or in Bangor, or some place in between. In fact, for many
county residents a regional jail could be closer than a jail in Belfast.
I don’t know if
that would produce a savings or not, but it seems that it would. The costs,
while somewhat greater that two counties, instead of burdening just one, would
share each one alone. Clearly, Waldo County can not afford $2 million more each
year on top of the existing already very-high County budget. If the towns in
Waldo and Knox can agree to work together on economic development, surely the
counties can work together on providing corrections services.
Another major
element, in conjunction with the above, is to seek the help of the state. The
state has established the rules of incarceration, which has resulted in the new
population boosts and additional costs. The property tax is not the appropriate
tax to support a jail system. The state pays for the state correctional system
through the sales and income tax but looks to the property tax to pay for county
jails. The state ought to either assume those costs or help out. It seems to me
that we ought to join forces with other counties to develop legislation for a
statewide corrections bond issue, to relieve the property tax.
John Hyk asks,
“What is the solution in your mind?” I present these thoughts to the City
Council to see if you think we should share these thoughts with the County
Commissioners.
Now, on the agenda:
11.B
Peirce School. You have plenty of comment on this
without needing any further word from me.
11.C
Retail Review Commission. I understand there will
be more discussion on this, but the formal report will be delivered at another
time. No action will be necessary at this time.
11.D
Workforce Affordable Housing. At the last Council
meeting, the City Council agreed to establish a Workforce Affordable Housing
Committee. That decision has caused a strong, popular response. One thing we
should be very clear about is that this should not be seen as a standing
committee, a committee which continues in existence, but rather one with a
specific goal, and when that goal is accomplished, the committee ceases to
exist.
Wayne Marshall
has drafted a mission statement for the committee, and it is included here (Salmon).
I think this forms a good basis for this committee to go forward.
In addition to
coming up with a mission statement, the Council asked us to offer some names for
committee membership. Some names we suggest for your consideration are:
ü
Paul Dean, a member of the Comprehensive
Plan Committee (he has said yes)
ü
Paul Hamilton, a member of the Planning
Board who is familiar with housing and construction (he has said yes);
ü
a City Councilor who would be better for you
to choose than for me to recommend;
ü
Sam Mitchell, from the real estate
community, if he is willing; he is very familiar with residential real estate
trends;
ü
Alan Wood, a real estate broker who has
volunteered for the committee, should be considered, although there are others
as well. I would recommend two real estate people, but no more than that.
ü
Ed Varney, a local resident and banker, if
he is willing; if not, another banker from the community who knows real estate
and financial matters;
ü
A local, major employer or HR person, who is
a Belfast resident. We will need to make some further phone calls to find the
right person, but I strongly suggest we include this category, since they deal
with the kind of individuals seeking the kind of housing we hope to address.
Maybe we should be thinking about two or three people in this category.
This would give
us seven members on the committee, to be staffed by both Wayne Marshall and
myself. We would want to call on other real estate people, builders, financial
providers, state and regional agencies as resource people but they need not be
on the committee. The committee should be from seven to nine people in number,
so if you want to add two people, that would be o.k.
Incidentally, although we are not talking
about subsidized housing in this instance, I do happen to have a 2001 summary of
subsidized, low-income housing available in Belfast and am enclosing it (Salmon)
for your information. You can add to that the added housing that is now ready to
be constructed (after a long litigation) on Searsport Avenue in the near future.
The next item, in fact, addresses that project.
11.E
Innovative Housing Program Resolution. Years ago,
the city sought and obtained a Community Development Block Grant to assist in
the development of low-income housing (as distinct from workforce, affordable
housing) and this project is going coming to fruition, i.e., construction start.
Wayne has prepared the enclosed resolution that is required under the CDBG
guidelines. (Gold)
11.F
TABOR. I don’t know whether the City Council will
want to take a position or not, but since there is a referendum question on the
November ballot which could have serious repercussions for local government, we
ought to discuss it a bit.
I will try not to
repeat a lot that you already know on the issue but do want to add some
information I have just learned in the past week or so. The legislation is more
than just limiting increases to the rate of inflation plus population growth and
is actually many pages thick.
Of course, the
measure affects all levels and forms of government in Maine: the state
government, although the legislature could legally, if not politically, ignore
it; school systems, county government, utility districts. Our concern is local
government.
The legislation,
if approved by the voters, would limit any spending increase by local government
to the rate of inflation and population growth (schools would be limited by the
inflation rate and student enrollment change).
If the Council
needed to spend more than that, the budget would have to be submitted to voters
in a separate referendum to approve the increased amount (an override). However,
to send it to a referendum will require a two-thirds vote of the Council; in
other words, a minority vote could block the will of the majority. In Belfast’s
case, it would take four councilors voting in favor of submitting it to
referendum, since two-thirds of five requires four votes. Two councilors could
veto the action.
What I have
learned recently, or had missed earlier, is that this applies to a mill rate
increase also, even if the increase in spending is under the
inflation-plus-population limit. For example, if the inflation plus population
change is 3.5%, and the budget came in at a 3% increase, but the increase in
valuation for the year was 1.5%, this would necessitate a mill rate increase and
thus be subject to the referendum requirement. (Unless everybody’s evaluation
was increased.)
Further, should a
budget override go to referendum, the Tabor legislation requires that the City
Clerk write a 500-word (up to) essay equally balanced between the argument for
the increase and an argument against increase (good luck, city clerk).
That’s not
enough. The Clerk then will have to mail that essay to every voter in
Belfast. The question arises on how you budget for the additional postage when
you don’t know whether these essays would have to be sent or not until a budget
is ready for adoption, but that is just another inconsistency in the bill. It is
also worth noting that we have around 4,000 registered voters, but usually only
around 1,000 vote in a municipal election. The essay will have to be sent, of
course, to all registered voters.
I am enclosing a
copy of a draft resolution (Green), as prepared by the Maine Municipal
Association that has been adopted by a number of town governing bodies to help
notify the electorate of their position. As a Council, you can choose to use
that or not take a collective public opinion. But it is here for your
information.
That’s everything
I have for this report. Bill Kelly has asked for an executive session to discuss
the legal issue of rights of way. If you are up to it Tuesday night, and it is
not too late and you are not too tired, we could also have an executive session
for an updated discussion on collective bargaining with the Police Department
personnel. We are close to finishing, and it would be good to review some final
thoughts before the committee wraps it up.
Have a good
weekend. |